Canadian officers Tuesday confirmed the loss of their forces’ seventy-first soldier killed in Afghanistan, 24-year-old Cpl. Nathan Hornburg of Calgary, Alberta.
Cpl. Hornburg was killed Monday in a Taliban mortar attack on his armoured column in the Panjwai district of Kandahar province. Three other soldiers were wounded by a rocket-propelled grenade in the exchange of fire that followed the attack.
While Canada’s troops have grappled head-on with Taliban forces since taking up their combat role in February, 2006, Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his minority Conservative government have deferred to the Bush administration’s lacklustre attempts to address the most urgent strategic consideration of the Kandahar theatre of operations: Pakistan.
Ultimate command and control of Taliban units such as the one responsible for Cpl. Hornburg’s death is exercised from safe havens in Pakistan's border regions.
Pakistani forces are currently disengaging from their face-off with Taliban and al Qaeda militants in Waziristan, further to the east, but have yet to take any meaningful action against the Taliban’s leadership and combat support assets in Baluchistan province, on Kandahar’s southern border.
Elements of Pakistan's military intelligence service, the ISI, continue to shelter the Taliban’s top leadership in Baluchistan. Taliban fighters pass freely from Pakistani territory into Kandahar, and Helmand province to the west.
On Monday, as Hornburg’s unit fought in Panjwai, Harper and his key ministers were half a world away in New York and Ottawa, and not bringing pressure to bear on their Pakistani counterparts over the Taliban’s sanctuary and support.
Harper was addressing climate change in New York, while his freshman Foreign Minister was signing up to the U.N.’s breathtakingly vague “joint communiqué” on Afghanistan. Defence Minister Peter MacKay, meanwhile, was in Ottawa, clarifying the government’s plan to notify its NATO partners by April of next year whether Canada will cease its combat role in February of 2009, as demanded by parliamentary opposition parties.
It was MacKay who undertook the government's last significant face-to-face meeting with Pakistani officials – more than eight months ago. During a visit to Islamabad in January, MacKay stressed Canada’s opposition to the building of a security fence on the Pakistan-Afghan border.
Since then, 27 Canadian soldiers have died in Kandahar, while the government has forwarded no other meaningful initiatives on the Taliban safe havens issue.
The Prime Minister has not appointed a special envoy to Pakistan – a statesman, for example, of former Prime Minister Joe Clark’s stature – to increase pressure on President Musharraf for results. Pakistan’s ambassador to Canada has not been carpeted on these concerns, much less sent packing back to Islamabad with clear and coherent messages for his government.
Neither has Stephen Harper taken steps to encourage Canada’s NATO allies to adopt new Pakistan strategies. Even in the face of growing impatience from the US intelligence community and the Pentagon over the absence of leadership from the White House, Harper and his closest aides have chosen to acquiesce to the status quo on the sanctuaries issue.
Sadly, this is a luxury not afforded the men and women of Canada’s mission to Kandahar, where Canadian troops continue to demonstrate great determination and courage under fire – despite the complete absence of responsible war leadership from Ottawa.
Another good man killed for something he believed in.My deepest sympathy to his family.
Arthur these politicians know Paksitan is a major obstacle in winning against the Taliban.Why is it they are so reluctant to go there and inflict some major damage.It's like they are saying go hide in Pakistan and we'll leave you alone.
One of Mr.Harpers statements in New York.
“Success demands governments who are willing to assume responsibilities, seek practical, do-able solutions to problems and who have a voice and influence in global affairs because they lead, not by lecturing, but by example".
Just this statement gives your post a great deal of credibility.
Hi Ted, actually Pakistan's ripe for diplomatic pressure. The Taliban and al Qaeda have worn out their welcome in many parts of the tribal areas, and this is where countries like Canada should be directing attention. Tribal leaderships and political parties opposed to the Taliban and to foreign extremists could benefit from encouragement - over Musharraf's head.
Most of all, Canada, Britain and other NATO states need to read the riot act to the blowback-prone leadership in Washington DC. The Bush administration put all their bets on Musharraf being able to root out Osama and the Taliban. That's failed miserably, but as in Iraq, the White House is bereft of contingencies and alternate strategies.
That's where the political leaders of the 60-or-so other nations signed up to the Afghanistan Compact need to show a little backbone - instead of the insincere posturing you've quoted so aptly above.
ı Ilave ın turkey
Excellent point on Canada's lack of effort on the diplomatic front. It serves as a fine demonstration of how "Support Our Troops" really is a simple case of our government of the day counting noses and telling the most people they can reach what they want to hear.
Cynical me, I have no doubt Ottawa speaking "independantly" in Pakistan would be a lot more likely if it somehow bolstered arms sales by the right (no pun intended) people. Until then its little more than a matter of not stepping on Washington's toes. Not only that but for our current government there's no profit in it, particularly political since doing so would highlight vulnerability. and THAT'S not going to happen.
Iam ın turkey
Yesterday,as best I can remember the Globe and Mail shut down it's blog to comments concerning this good man's death citing respect for the family.
At the same time many were posting comments(con and pro) for Harpers speech in which comments about Afghanistan and Canada's role in it were all positive.
When people(Troops and Civilians) are being killed,
needless to say, we should exhibit sympathy,compassion and soul searching empathy.
Many use these blogs to express their feelings and whether it be positive,angry,or out and out idiotic.
Denying them this right is simply wrong.